The Tate Murders Were Faked

Markus Allen of Truth in 7 Minutes recently mentioned on his show this awesome exposé from Miles Mathis showing how the Tate murders were faked.

"Ask yourself this: do 5 foot 3 ex-con bums like Manson “have a gift for attracting wayward teen girls”? Do they now? Did they in 1969? No. What attracts young girls is money and fame, and Manson had (or should have had) neither."

"If these murders are fake, and if most of the main characters are paid agents, then we don't need anyone to be mindcontrolled. This is why the government doesn't mind seeing conspiracy theories that include mindcontrol or Satanism: those theories still include real murders and real corpses, so the desired story is kept intact. You are allowed and encouraged to theorize along those lines all you want, with Mae Brussell and others. The only theory you are not allowed to pursue is the correct one: the murders were faked."

"Manson then missed parole appointments throughout 1967 and 1968, was arrested for marijuana possession in May,1968, and for counterfeited driver's licenses in April, 1968 (the famous Oxnard bust). He was arrested again on June 4, 1969, for rape. Although any of those things should have landed him back in jail, he always managed to skate. I guess we are supposed to believe that California state police were impressed by his beard and Jesus bit."

"Hollywood is basically a subdivision of the CIA and military intelligence. The entire entertainment industry is a vast subdivision of military intelligence, including music, TV, art, film, and a majority of the internet. This is what the Matrix really is: not a dream induced by robot bugs, but a waking false reality created by uberdirectors."


3 comments:

  1. You don't even need to theorize about it. Just research each death as if it were an ancestor and you are building a family tree. Try to confirm each one as being dead through the social security death master file. Check for baby Tate's fetal death record on ancestry. Look at the headstone, there isn't even a date for the baby. By law a fetus that is more than 20 weeks requires a fetal death certificate to be interned. My aunt's stillborn daughters are registered with the State of California Vital Records Department one occurred in 1971 the other in 73, You can find them on Ancestry. You can't find Paul Tate's though. To make doubly sure I sent money to the state and asked for a hard copy of his death record. For 18.00 I received a Certificate of No Record Found. The only victim of the Manson family's two night killing spree that is verifiable in the Social Security death master is Leno LaBianca. All are listed in the California death index but I wouldn't put too much importance in that because Rosemary was born in 1924, her license said 1929 and the California death index says 1930. So theorizing about rather these deaths happened or not isn't necessary when the records themselves are proof enough they didn't happen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You don't even need to theorize about it. Just research each death as if it were an ancestor and you are building a family tree. Try to confirm each one as being dead through the social security death master file. Check for baby Tate's fetal death record on ancestry. Look at the headstone, there isn't even a date for the baby. By law a fetus that is more than 20 weeks requires a fetal death certificate to be interned. My aunt's stillborn daughters are registered with the State of California Vital Records Department one occurred in 1971 the other in 73, You can find them on Ancestry. You can't find Paul Tate's though. To make doubly sure I sent money to the state and asked for a hard copy of his death record. For 18.00 I received a Certificate of No Record Found. The only victim of the Manson family's two night killing spree that is verifiable in the Social Security death master is Leno LaBianca. All are listed in the California death index but I wouldn't put too much importance in that because Rosemary was born in 1924, her license said 1929 and the California death index says 1930. So theorizing about rather these deaths happened or not isn't necessary when the records themselves are proof enough they didn't happen.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I sent this to a friend earlier today:

    You know what's funny? We live in an age where people entertain the idea that Jesus was an ET, Bigfoot exists, ghosts are everywhere and can be communicated with with a Mini Mag light; but you ask them to consider the possibility that group of people might have faked their deaths to help the government pass laws and engineer society so it would be easier to deal with and they look at you like you have two heads.

    ReplyDelete